- Winkelwagen
- Afrekenen
- Bestelling voltooid
You May Be Interested In…
Riens Kubica 7000
In stock
DX Kogelstiftpaumelle kantelaaf ronde hoeken 89×150 mm SKG***® staal verzinkt Rechts per 10 stuks
In stock
| b-mm |
150 |
|---|---|
| o (mm) |
16 |
| Artikelnummer |
«6912.215.8915-0 ,6972.215.8915-0 |
| EAN |
8714140162031 ,8714140228638 |
| Labelcode |
H179150892125 ,VERVALLEN |
| MBH |
6 |
| Toepassing |
voor terugliggende buitendeuren |
| Finish |
blank verzinkt |
| Normering |
SKG**® |
| h-mm |
89 |
| d-mm |
3.0 |
| B(mm) |
150 |
| P(mm) |
– |
| Draagkracht per 3 kg |
50 |
| Draagkracht per 4 kg |
65 |
| Afwerking hoek |
ronde hoeken |
| Aanbevolen schroefmaat |
4.5 x 45 mm (niet ingesloten) |
| Certificering |
CE 27201417 / SKH |
| Materiaal |
Staal |
Riens Nemef 4139
In stock
DX Hangslot DX PRO-LINE standaard open beugel 50 mm SKG*® zilver per stuk
In stock
| b-mm |
52 |
|---|---|
| c-mm |
22 |
| f-mm |
26 |
| e-mm |
2,5 |
| Sluiting |
verschillend sluitend (of gelijksluitend op aanvraag) |
| Artikelnummer |
0182.600.0050 |
| EAN |
8714140211326 |
| Labelcode |
HSPRO 50 O SE |
| MBH |
1 |
| Verpakking |
blister |
| Normering |
SKG**® |
| d-mm |
10 |
| Sluting |
verschillend sluitend (of gelijksluitend op aanvraag) |
| A(mm) |
52 |
| B(mm) |
52 |
| Materiaal beuge |
gehard staal |
| Cilinder |
schijven |
| Accessoires |
3 sleutels met security card |
| E(mm) |
2,5 |
| F(mm) |
26 |
| Beugel |
standaard open beugel (OS) |
| Bergrendeling beugel |
dubbelzijdig |
| Certificering |
EN 1627 / EN12320 |
| Materiaal |
gehard zink (HSPRO 50) gehard staal (HSPRO 60 en 70) |
| Merk |
DX |
Cart Totals
Totalen winkelwagen
| Subtotaal | € 6,63 |
|---|---|
| Verzending |
|
| Totaal | € 20,63 (inclusief € 3,58 btw) |
Delivery & Return
How can you evaluate content without design? No typography, no colors, no layout, no styles, all those things that convey the important signals that go beyond the mere textual, hierarchies of information, weight.
To short sentences, to many headings, images too large for the proposed design, or too small, or they fit in but it looks iffy for reasons the folks in the meeting can’t quite tell right now, but they’re unhappy, somehow.
How can you evaluate content without design? No typography, no colors, no layout, no styles, all those things that convey the important signals that go beyond the mere textual, hierarchies of information, weight.
To short sentences, to many headings, images too large for the proposed design, or too small, or they fit in but it looks iffy for reasons the folks in the meeting can’t quite tell right now, but they’re unhappy, somehow.
How can you evaluate content without design? No typography, no colors, no layout, no styles, all those things that convey the important signals that go beyond the mere textual, hierarchies of information, weight.