- Winkelwagen
- Afrekenen
- Bestelling voltooid
You May Be Interested In…
Riens Scharniermal 89×79
In stock
Riens 89×89 Scharniermal
In stock
DX Kogelstiftpaumelle kantelaaf ronde hoeken 150×89 mm SKG***® RVS geborsteld Links Per stuks
In stock
| b-mm |
150 |
|---|---|
| o (mm) |
16 |
| Artikelnummer |
6937.133.8915-0 |
| EAN |
8714140205141 |
| Labelcode |
H379150892313 |
| MBH |
6 |
| Toepassing |
voor terugliggende buitendeuren |
| Finish |
RVS geborsteld |
| Normering |
SKG**® |
| h-mm |
89 |
| d-mm |
3.0 |
| B(mm) |
150 |
| Knoopuitvoering |
volledig gesloten platte knoop |
| P(mm) |
nvt |
| Draagkracht per 3 kg |
50 |
| Draagkracht per 4 kg |
65 |
| Afwerking hoek |
ronde hoeken |
| Aanbevolen schroefmaat |
4.5 x 45 mm (niet ingesloten) |
| Certificering |
CE 27201417 / SKH |
| Materiaal |
RVS 304 |
| Merk |
DX |
DX Pompespagnolet afsluitbaar 16 mm staal verzinkt per stuk
In stock
| b-mm |
250 |
|---|---|
| c-mm |
52 |
| Vergrendeling |
afsluitbaar d.m.v. een geïntegreerde cilinder |
| e-mm |
22 |
| Sluiting |
gelijksluitend |
| Artikelnummer |
0160.505.2010 |
| EAN |
4016753022158 |
| Labelcode |
ESPOMP 16 CIL |
| MBH |
1 |
| Toepassing |
naar buitendraaiende (dubbele) deuren en ramen |
| Finish |
verzinkt |
| d-mm |
95 |
| Geschikt voor |
16 mm pompespagnoletstangen |
| Sluting |
gelijksluitend |
| A(mm) |
167 |
| B(mm) |
250 |
| E(mm) |
22 |
| Lengte (mm) |
tot 3.000 |
| Materiaal |
Staal |
| Uitvoering |
opbouw |
| Merk |
DX |
Cart Totals
Totalen winkelwagen
| Subtotaal | € 367,95 |
|---|---|
| Verzending |
|
| Totaal | € 381,95 (inclusief € 66,29 btw) |
Delivery & Return
How can you evaluate content without design? No typography, no colors, no layout, no styles, all those things that convey the important signals that go beyond the mere textual, hierarchies of information, weight.
To short sentences, to many headings, images too large for the proposed design, or too small, or they fit in but it looks iffy for reasons the folks in the meeting can’t quite tell right now, but they’re unhappy, somehow.
How can you evaluate content without design? No typography, no colors, no layout, no styles, all those things that convey the important signals that go beyond the mere textual, hierarchies of information, weight.
To short sentences, to many headings, images too large for the proposed design, or too small, or they fit in but it looks iffy for reasons the folks in the meeting can’t quite tell right now, but they’re unhappy, somehow.
How can you evaluate content without design? No typography, no colors, no layout, no styles, all those things that convey the important signals that go beyond the mere textual, hierarchies of information, weight.